China Standard Inner Diameter 60 Single Acting Hydraulic Cylinder wholesaler

Product Description

Product Description

Quick details

Gland ----High grade ductile iron

Tube  -----Cold drawn honed tubling

Piston-----High grade ductile iron

Piston rod----Chromed C45

Piston seal----Urethane seal

End cap----Casting seel

Mounting style----Pins and clips included

Gland seals----Polyurethane U-cup

Rod wiper----Urethane snap in

Paint color----Semi-gloss black, grey, red

1.Light-weight,high strength

   Base on the nature of construction work,the hydraulic cylinders need to suit for high strength,high

   using frequency,high fatigability.to promise the sability and reliablity of application.

2.the seal system

   select the excellent seal kits from japan and germany.adopt the advanced physical design,make

   sure the hydraulic cylinder get the best piston rod oil film

3.cylinder body

   adopt the good-quality alloy honed tube,though cold-drawing and rolling,to reach an excellent

   toughness and surface hardness.improve the wear-resistance.

4.piston rod

   middle frequency induction hardening and tempering,chrome plated on rod surface to improve the

   anti-rust ,wear-resistance and anti-scratch property.

5.safety/cushioning fuction

   The inside of cylinder set up an cushioning device in the end of stroke,it can absorb the juge inpact.

Technical Specification size.
 

cylinder diameter (mm)

piston rod diameter (mm)

max stroke (mm)

40

20

22

25

500

50

25

28

32

600

63

32

35

45

800

80

40

45

55

2000

90

45

50

63

2000

100

50

55

70

4000

110

55

63

80

4000

125

63

70

90

4000

140

70

80

100

4000

150

75

85

105

4000

160

80

90

110

4000

180

90

100

125

4000

200

100

110

140

4000

220

110

125

160

4000

250

125

140

180

4000

 Cylinder tube machining

  
  
  Piston 
  

Application boom cylider, stick cylinder, Dozer cylinder.
 

Excavator Type Name Stroke  (mm) Installation Diameter(mm) Cylinder Diameter(mm) Rod Diameter(mm)
5.5T Boom Cylinder 710 1120 115 65
Stick Cylinder 815 1210 90 55
Bucket Cylinder 605 945 85 55
Dozer Cylinder 150 500 110 60
6.5T Boom Cylinder 885 1311 110 65
Stick Cylinder 900 1300 90 60
Bucket Cylinder 730 1120 80 50
Dozer Cylinder 145 565 130 70
11.5T Left Boom Cylinder 980 1480 100 70
Right Boom Cylinder 980 1480 100 70
Stick Cylinder 1571 1530 115 80
Bucket Cylinder 885 1375 95 65
18.5T Left Boom Cylinder 1195 1790 120 85
Right Boom Cylinder 1195 1790 120 85
Stick Cylinder 1405 2000 130 95
Bucket Cylinder 1110 1630 110 80
20T Boom Cylinder 1285 1870 120 85
Stick Cylinder 1490 2075 135 95
Bucket Cylinder 1120 1680 115 80
23T Boom Cylinder Assembly 1295 1870 130 90
Stick Cylinder Assembly 1675 2225 140 100
Bucket Cylinder Assembly 1156 1744 130 90
26T Boom Cylinder Assembly 1420 1980 139 100
Stick Cylinder Assembly 1748 2348 149 110
Bucket Cylinder Assembly 1130 1753 134 100
40T Boom Cylinder Assembly 1495 2135 160 110
Stick Cylinder Assembly 1790 2480 170 110
Bucket Cylinder Assembly 1285 1990 160 110

Q: Are you trading company or manufacturer ?

A: We are factory.

Q: How long is your delivery time?

A: Generally it is 5-10 days if the goods are in stock. or it is 15-20 days if the goods are not in stock, it is according to quantity.

Q: Do you provide samples ? is it free or extra ?

A: Yes, we could offer the sample for free charge but do not pay the cost of freight.

Q: What is your terms of payment ?

A: Payment 30%TT in advance. 70% T/T before shippment

Stiffness and Torsional Vibration of Spline-Couplings

In this paper, we describe some basic characteristics of spline-coupling and examine its torsional vibration behavior. We also explore the effect of spline misalignment on rotor-spline coupling. These results will assist in the design of improved spline-coupling systems for various applications. The results are presented in Table 1.
splineshaft

Stiffness of spline-coupling

The stiffness of a spline-coupling is a function of the meshing force between the splines in a rotor-spline coupling system and the static vibration displacement. The meshing force depends on the coupling parameters such as the transmitting torque and the spline thickness. It increases nonlinearly with the spline thickness.
A simplified spline-coupling model can be used to evaluate the load distribution of splines under vibration and transient loads. The axle spline sleeve is displaced a z-direction and a resistance moment T is applied to the outer face of the sleeve. This simple model can satisfy a wide range of engineering requirements but may suffer from complex loading conditions. Its asymmetric clearance may affect its engagement behavior and stress distribution patterns.
The results of the simulations show that the maximum vibration acceleration in both Figures 10 and 22 was 3.03 g/s. This results indicate that a misalignment in the circumferential direction increases the instantaneous impact. Asymmetry in the coupling geometry is also found in the meshing. The right-side spline's teeth mesh tightly while those on the left side are misaligned.
Considering the spline-coupling geometry, a semi-analytical model is used to compute stiffness. This model is a simplified form of a classical spline-coupling model, with submatrices defining the shape and stiffness of the joint. As the design clearance is a known value, the stiffness of a spline-coupling system can be analyzed using the same formula.
The results of the simulations also show that the spline-coupling system can be modeled using MASTA, a high-level commercial CAE tool for transmission analysis. In this case, the spline segments were modeled as a series of spline segments with variable stiffness, which was calculated based on the initial gap between spline teeth. Then, the spline segments were modelled as a series of splines of increasing stiffness, accounting for different manufacturing variations. The resulting analysis of the spline-coupling geometry is compared to those of the finite-element approach.
Despite the high stiffness of a spline-coupling system, the contact status of the contact surfaces often changes. In addition, spline coupling affects the lateral vibration and deformation of the rotor. However, stiffness nonlinearity is not well studied in splined rotors because of the lack of a fully analytical model.
splineshaft

Characteristics of spline-coupling

The study of spline-coupling involves a number of design factors. These include weight, materials, and performance requirements. Weight is particularly important in the aeronautics field. Weight is often an issue for design engineers because materials have varying dimensional stability, weight, and durability. Additionally, space constraints and other configuration restrictions may require the use of spline-couplings in certain applications.
The main parameters to consider for any spline-coupling design are the maximum principal stress, the maldistribution factor, and the maximum tooth-bearing stress. The magnitude of each of these parameters must be smaller than or equal to the external spline diameter, in order to provide stability. The outer diameter of the spline must be at least 4 inches larger than the inner diameter of the spline.
Once the physical design is validated, the spline coupling knowledge base is created. This model is pre-programmed and stores the design parameter signals, including performance and manufacturing constraints. It then compares the parameter values to the design rule signals, and constructs a geometric representation of the spline coupling. A visual model is created from the input signals, and can be manipulated by changing different parameters and specifications.
The stiffness of a spline joint is another important parameter for determining the spline-coupling stiffness. The stiffness distribution of the spline joint affects the rotor's lateral vibration and deformation. A finite element method is a useful technique for obtaining lateral stiffness of spline joints. This method involves many mesh refinements and requires a high computational cost.
The diameter of the spline-coupling must be large enough to transmit the torque. A spline with a larger diameter may have greater torque-transmitting capacity because it has a smaller circumference. However, the larger diameter of a spline is thinner than the shaft, and the latter may be more suitable if the torque is spread over a greater number of teeth.
Spline-couplings are classified according to their tooth profile along the axial and radial directions. The radial and axial tooth profiles affect the component's behavior and wear damage. Splines with a crowned tooth profile are prone to angular misalignment. Typically, these spline-couplings are oversized to ensure durability and safety.

Stiffness of spline-coupling in torsional vibration analysis

This article presents a general framework for the study of torsional vibration caused by the stiffness of spline-couplings in aero-engines. It is based on a previous study on spline-couplings. It is characterized by the following 3 factors: bending stiffness, total flexibility, and tangential stiffness. The first criterion is the equivalent diameter of external and internal splines. Both the spline-coupling stiffness and the displacement of splines are evaluated by using the derivative of the total flexibility.
The stiffness of a spline joint can vary based on the distribution of load along the spline. Variables affecting the stiffness of spline joints include the torque level, tooth indexing errors, and misalignment. To explore the effects of these variables, an analytical formula is developed. The method is applicable for various kinds of spline joints, such as splines with multiple components.
Despite the difficulty of calculating spline-coupling stiffness, it is possible to model the contact between the teeth of the shaft and the hub using an analytical approach. This approach helps in determining key magnitudes of coupling operation such as contact peak pressures, reaction moments, and angular momentum. This approach allows for accurate results for spline-couplings and is suitable for both torsional vibration and structural vibration analysis.
The stiffness of spline-coupling is commonly assumed to be rigid in dynamic models. However, various dynamic phenomena associated with spline joints must be captured in high-fidelity drivetrain models. To accomplish this, a general analytical stiffness formulation is proposed based on a semi-analytical spline load distribution model. The resulting stiffness matrix contains radial and tilting stiffness values as well as torsional stiffness. The analysis is further simplified with the blockwise inversion method.
It is essential to consider the torsional vibration of a power transmission system before selecting the coupling. An accurate analysis of torsional vibration is crucial for coupling safety. This article also discusses case studies of spline shaft wear and torsionally-induced failures. The discussion will conclude with the development of a robust and efficient method to simulate these problems in real-life scenarios.
splineshaft

Effect of spline misalignment on rotor-spline coupling

In this study, the effect of spline misalignment in rotor-spline coupling is investigated. The stability boundary and mechanism of rotor instability are analyzed. We find that the meshing force of a misaligned spline coupling increases nonlinearly with spline thickness. The results demonstrate that the misalignment is responsible for the instability of the rotor-spline coupling system.
An intentional spline misalignment is introduced to achieve an interference fit and zero backlash condition. This leads to uneven load distribution among the spline teeth. A further spline misalignment of 50um can result in rotor-spline coupling failure. The maximum tensile root stress shifted to the left under this condition.
Positive spline misalignment increases the gear mesh misalignment. Conversely, negative spline misalignment has no effect. The right-handed spline misalignment is opposite to the helix hand. The high contact area is moved from the center to the left side. In both cases, gear mesh is misaligned due to deflection and tilting of the gear under load.
This variation of the tooth surface is measured as the change in clearance in the transverse plain. The radial and axial clearance values are the same, while the difference between the 2 is less. In addition to the frictional force, the axial clearance of the splines is the same, which increases the gear mesh misalignment. Hence, the same procedure can be used to determine the frictional force of a rotor-spline coupling.
Gear mesh misalignment influences spline-rotor coupling performance. This misalignment changes the distribution of the gear mesh and alters contact and bending stresses. Therefore, it is essential to understand the effects of misalignment in spline couplings. Using a simplified system of helical gear pair, Hong et al. examined the load distribution along the tooth interface of the spline. This misalignment caused the flank contact pattern to change. The misaligned teeth exhibited deflection under load and developed a tilting moment on the gear.
The effect of spline misalignment in rotor-spline couplings is minimized by using a mechanism that reduces backlash. The mechanism comprises cooperably splined male and female members. One member is formed by 2 coaxially aligned splined segments with end surfaces shaped to engage in sliding relationship. The connecting device applies axial loads to these segments, causing them to rotate relative to 1 another.

China Standard Inner Diameter 60 Single Acting Hydraulic Cylinder     wholesaler China Standard Inner Diameter 60 Single Acting Hydraulic Cylinder     wholesaler